CRLGApr 24

Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systems

arXiv:2604.2213685.12 citations
AI Analysis

For developers deploying LLM agents in real-world systems, SAL provides a safety mechanism to prevent unsafe API calls, addressing a critical risk in current agent architectures.

The paper introduces Sovereign Agentic Loops (SAL), a control-plane architecture that decouples LLM reasoning from execution by validating intents against system state and policy, achieving 93% unsafe intent blocking at the policy layer and preventing all unsafe executions with only 12.4 ms median latency.

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly issue API calls that mutate real systems, yet many current architectures pass stochastic model outputs directly to execution layers. We argue that this coupling creates a safety risk because model correctness, context awareness, and alignment cannot be assumed at execution time. We introduce Sovereign Agentic Loops (SAL), a control-plane architecture in which models emit structured intents with justifications, and the control plane validates those intents against true system state and policy before execution. SAL combines an obfuscation membrane, which limits model access to identity-sensitive state, with a cryptographically linked Evidence Chain for auditability and replay. We formalize SAL and show that, under the stated assumptions, it provides policy-bounded execution, identity isolation, and deterministic replay. In an OpenKedge prototype for cloud infrastructure, SAL blocks 93% of unsafe intents at the policy layer, rejects the remaining 7% via consistency checks, prevents unsafe executions in our benchmark, and adds 12.4 ms median latency.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes