CLMay 1

Agentic AI for Substance Use Education: Integrating Regulatory and Scientific Knowledge Sources

arXiv:2605.0038362.9h-index: 2
Predicted impact top 96% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for scalable, personalized, and up-to-date substance use education, but the evaluation is small-scale (5 experts, 30 questions) and the novelty is incremental.

The authors built an agentic AI web application that integrates Drug Enforcement Administration records with peer-reviewed literature to provide real-time substance use education. Expert evaluation showed mean ratings of 4.18-4.35 across four criteria (factual accuracy, citation quality, contextual coherence, regulatory appropriateness) with substantial inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.78).

The delivery of traditional substance education has remained problematic due to challenges in scalability, personalization, and the currency of information in a rapidly evolving substance use landscape. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising frontier for enhancing educational delivery, its application in providing real-time, authoritative substance use education remains largely underexplored. We built an agentic-based AI web application that combined Drug Enforcement Administration records with peer-reviewed literature in real-time to provide transparent context-sensitive substance use education. The system uses retrieval-augmented generation with a carefully filtered corpus of 102 documents and dynamic PubMed queries. Document storage was semantically chunked and placed in a vector representation in order to be easily retrieved. We conducted an expert evaluation study in which a panel of five subject matter experts generated 30 domain-specific questions, and two independent raters assessed 90 system interactions (30 primary questions plus two contextual follow-ups each) using a five-point Likert scale across four criteria: factual accuracy, citation quality, contextual coherence, and regulatory appropriateness. Mean ratings ranged from 4.18 to 4.35 across the four criteria (overall category range: 4.05-4.52), with substantial inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.78). These findings suggest that agentic AI architectures integrating authoritative regulatory sources with real-time scientific literature represent a promising direction for scalable, accurate, and verifiable health education delivery, warranting further evaluation through longitudinal user studies.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes