AIMay 2

Multi-Agent Reasoning Improves Compute Efficiency: Pareto-Optimal Test-Time Scaling

arXiv:2605.0156669.4h-index: 14
AI Analysis

For practitioners deploying LLMs under resource constraints, this work provides actionable guidelines on which inference-time scaling method to use for optimal accuracy per compute.

The paper analyzes inference scaling strategies (self-consistency, self-refinement, multi-agent debate, mixture-of-agents) on reasoning benchmarks, finding that multi-agent methods achieve Pareto-optimal accuracy-compute tradeoffs, with mixture-of-agents outperforming self-consistency by 2.7% points at equal compute budgets.

Advances in inference methods have enabled language models to improve their predictions without additional training. These methods often prioritize raw performance over cost-effective compute usage. However, computational efficiency is key for real-world applications with resource constraints. We provide a systematic analysis of the inference scaling strategies self-consistency, self-refinement, multi-agent debate, and mixture-of-agents, to study their computational performance tradeoffs. We evaluate methods on two reasoning benchmarks (MMLU-Pro, BBH) and include extensive parameter configurations (e.g., scaling the number of parallel predictions, agents, and debate rounds) across different model sizes. Across 34 configurations and over 100 evaluations, we compute the Pareto-optimal front to select methods that achieve the best accuracy with the lowest computational budget. Notably, inference scaling improves accuracy by up to +7.1% points over chain-of-thought at the highest evaluated budgets (20x the CoT compute budget) on MMLU-Pro. With an equal computing budget, debate and mixture-of-agents outperform self-consistency by 1.3% and 2.7% points, respectively. While self-consistency saturates earlier, multi-agent gains persist, particularly on more complicated tasks. We identify a simple multi-agent design guideline: mixture-of-agents is most efficient when the number of parallel generations exceeds the number of sequential aggregations.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes