Stability beyond Bounded Differences: Sharp Generalization Bounds under Finite $L_p$ Moments

arXiv:2606.068557.7
Predicted impact top 13% in ML · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

For machine learning theorists, this work significantly weakens the standard assumptions required for stability-based generalization guarantees, making them applicable to heavy-tailed or unbounded loss settings.

This paper develops sharp high-probability generalization bounds for learning algorithms under only finite $L_p$ moment conditions, extending stability-based analysis beyond boundedness or sub-Gaussian assumptions. The results cover empirical risk minimization, transductive regression, and meta-learning.

While algorithmic stability is a central tool for understanding generalization of learning algorithms, existing high-probability guarantees typically rely on uniform boundedness or sub-Gaussian/sub-Weibull tail assumptions, which can be overly restrictive for modern settings with heavy-tailed or unbounded losses. We develop a stability-based framework that requires only a finite $L_p$ moment condition. Our first contribution is sharp concentration inequalities for functions of independent random variables under $L_p$ constraints, extending McDiarmid's bounded-differences techniques beyond the classical regime. Leveraging these results, we derive sharp high-probability generalization bounds across a range of learning paradigms, including empirical risk minimization, transductive regression, and meta-learning. These guarantees show that $L_p$ stability suffices for robust generalization even when boundedness fails, substantially weakening the standard assumptions in the stability literature.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes