DBJul 15

Lexicographic Direct Access with Functional Dependencies

arXiv:2607.1387510.1
Predicted impact top 21% in DB · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For database theorists, this work advances the understanding of direct access complexity under functional dependencies, though results are not fully tight.

This paper studies the complexity of lexicographic direct access to join query answers over databases with functional dependencies, providing fine-grained lower and upper bounds on preprocessing time for polylogarithmic access time. The results yield a complete characterization for linear preprocessing time, with lower bounds relying on the Zero-Clique Conjecture.

We study the complexity of lexicographic direct access to join query answers over databases that satisfy functional dependencies (FDs). More precisely, we give fine-grained lower and upper bounds on the preprocessing time required to achieve polylogarithmic access time. We start by considering the simple approach of a reordered extension, which first incorporates the FDs in the query and order, and then ignores the FDs during evaluation. We show that this simple approach gives tight bounds for unary FDs but fails for general FDs. We then consider a second approach, inspired by size bounds for query answers using information theory, that takes the FDs into account while materializing the bags of a decomposition tailored to the direct access task at hand. Interestingly, we show that the same reordering is also useful while constructing the decomposition in this second approach for reducing the complexity. While the obtained upper and lower bounds are generally not tight, we show that they yield a complete characterization of lexicographic direct access with linear preprocessing time. All lower bounds in this paper apply only to queries without self-joins and rely on the Zero-Clique Conjecture.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes