Understanding Generalization and Optimization Performance of Deep CNNs
It provides theoretical insights into why deep CNNs generalize well, addressing a foundational issue in machine learning for researchers and practitioners.
This paper tackles the problem of theoretically explaining the success of deep CNNs by analyzing their generalization error and optimization guarantees, proving a tighter generalization bound of O(√(θ̃ρ̃/n)) that depends logarithmically on network parameters and showing that gradient descent yields approximate stationary points for both empirical and population risks.
This work aims to provide understandings on the remarkable success of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) by theoretically analyzing their generalization performance and establishing optimization guarantees for gradient descent based training algorithms. Specifically, for a CNN model consisting of $l$ convolutional layers and one fully connected layer, we prove that its generalization error is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\dt\widetilde{\varrho}/n})$ where $θ$ denotes freedom degree of the network parameters and $\widetilde{\varrho}=\mathcal{O}(\log(\prod_{i=1}^{l}\rwi{i} (\ki{i}-\si{i}+1)/p)+\log(\rf))$ encapsulates architecture parameters including the kernel size $\ki{i}$, stride $\si{i}$, pooling size $p$ and parameter magnitude $\rwi{i}$. To our best knowledge, this is the first generalization bound that only depends on $\mathcal{O}(\log(\prod_{i=1}^{l+1}\rwi{i}))$, tighter than existing ones that all involve an exponential term like $\mathcal{O}(\prod_{i=1}^{l+1}\rwi{i})$. Besides, we prove that for an arbitrary gradient descent algorithm, the computed approximate stationary point by minimizing empirical risk is also an approximate stationary point to the population risk. This well explains why gradient descent training algorithms usually perform sufficiently well in practice. Furthermore, we prove the one-to-one correspondence and convergence guarantees for the non-degenerate stationary points between the empirical and population risks. It implies that the computed local minimum for the empirical risk is also close to a local minimum for the population risk, thus ensuring the good generalization performance of CNNs.