Data Augmentation with norm-VAE for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
This work addresses the problem of adapting image classifiers to new, unlabeled target domains for researchers and practitioners in computer vision, offering an incremental improvement over existing UDA methods.
This paper tackles Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) in image classification by learning a unified classifier in a high-dimensional feature space, avoiding explicit domain adaptation. They achieve new state-of-the-art performance with average accuracies of 93.4% and 90.4% on Office-Caltech and ImageCLEF-DA datasets, respectively.
We address the Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) problem in image classification from a new perspective. In contrast to most existing works which either align the data distributions or learn domain-invariant features, we directly learn a unified classifier for both domains within a high-dimensional homogeneous feature space without explicit domain adaptation. To this end, we employ the effective Selective Pseudo-Labelling (SPL) techniques to take advantage of the unlabelled samples in the target domain. Surprisingly, data distribution discrepancy across the source and target domains can be well handled by a computationally simple classifier (e.g., a shallow Multi-Layer Perceptron) trained in the original feature space. Besides, we propose a novel generative model norm-VAE to generate synthetic features for the target domain as a data augmentation strategy to enhance classifier training. Experimental results on several benchmark datasets demonstrate the pseudo-labelling strategy itself can lead to comparable performance to many state-of-the-art methods whilst the use of norm-VAE for feature augmentation can further improve the performance in most cases. As a result, our proposed methods (i.e. naive-SPL and norm-VAE-SPL) can achieve new state-of-the-art performance with the average accuracy of 93.4% and 90.4% on Office-Caltech and ImageCLEF-DA datasets, and comparable performance on Digits, Office31 and Office-Home datasets with the average accuracy of 97.2%, 87.6% and 67.9% respectively.