Real-time Model Predictive Control and System Identification Using Differentiable Physics Simulation
This addresses the problem of transferring robot controllers from simulation to real-world environments for robotics applications, representing an incremental advancement in adaptive control methods.
The paper tackles the sim-to-real gap by developing a differentiable physics simulation framework for real-time system identification and model predictive control, enabling robots to adapt to dynamically-changing environments with improved sample efficiency and favorable results compared to baselines.
Developing robot controllers in a simulated environment is advantageous but transferring the controllers to the target environment presents challenges, often referred to as the "sim-to-real gap". We present a method for continuous improvement of modeling and control after deploying the robot to a dynamically-changing target environment. We develop a differentiable physics simulation framework that performs online system identification and optimal control simultaneously, using the incoming observations from the target environment in real time. To ensure robust system identification against noisy observations, we devise an algorithm to assess the confidence of our estimated parameters, using numerical analysis of the dynamic equations. To ensure real-time optimal control, we adaptively schedule the optimization window in the future so that the optimized actions can be replenished faster than they are consumed, while staying as up-to-date with new sensor information as possible. The constant re-planning based on a constantly improved model allows the robot to swiftly adapt to the changing environment and utilize real-world data in the most sample-efficient way. Thanks to a fast differentiable physics simulator, the optimization for both system identification and control can be solved efficiently for robots operating in real time. We demonstrate our method on a set of examples in simulation and show that our results are favorable compared to baseline methods.