LGAICVNov 27, 2024

Proactive Gradient Conflict Mitigation in Multi-Task Learning: A Sparse Training Perspective

arXiv:2411.18615v19 citationsh-index: 11
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a key bottleneck in multi-task learning for developing generalist AI agents, but it is incremental as it builds on existing gradient manipulation methods.

The paper tackles gradient conflict in multi-task learning, which causes tasks to compete during joint training, and proposes using sparse training to reduce conflicts, leading to improved performance as demonstrated in experiments.

Advancing towards generalist agents necessitates the concurrent processing of multiple tasks using a unified model, thereby underscoring the growing significance of simultaneous model training on multiple downstream tasks. A common issue in multi-task learning is the occurrence of gradient conflict, which leads to potential competition among different tasks during joint training. This competition often results in improvements in one task at the expense of deterioration in another. Although several optimization methods have been developed to address this issue by manipulating task gradients for better task balancing, they cannot decrease the incidence of gradient conflict. In this paper, we systematically investigate the occurrence of gradient conflict across different methods and propose a strategy to reduce such conflicts through sparse training (ST), wherein only a portion of the model's parameters are updated during training while keeping the rest unchanged. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that ST effectively mitigates conflicting gradients and leads to superior performance. Furthermore, ST can be easily integrated with gradient manipulation techniques, thus enhancing their effectiveness.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes