MAAIApr 19

Dynamics of Cognitive Heterogeneity: Investigating Behavioral Biases in Multi-Stage Supply Chains with LLM-Based Simulation

arXiv:2604.1722013.3h-index: 12
Predicted impact top 25% in MA · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For operations management and AI research, this work extends traditional behavioral methods by using LLM-based agents to study cognitive biases in supply chains, offering new insights into AI-enabled organizations.

This paper introduces a scalable experimental paradigm using LLMs to simulate multi-stage supply chain dynamics, investigating how cognitive heterogeneity (varying reasoning sophistication across tiers) influences collective outcomes. Results show that myopic and self-interested behaviors exacerbate inefficiencies, but information sharing mitigates these effects.

Modeling coordination among generative agents in complex multi-round decision-making presents a core challenge for AI and operations management. Although behavioral experiments have revealed cognitive biases behind supply chain inefficiencies, traditional methods face scalability and control limitations. We introduce a scalable experimental paradigm using Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate multi-stage supply chain dynamics. Grounded in a Hierarchical Reasoning Framework, this study specifically analyzes the impact of cognitive heterogeneity on agent interactions. Unlike prior homogeneous settings, we employ DeepSeek and GPT agents to systematically vary reasoning sophistication across supply chain tiers. Through rigorously replicated and statistically validated simulations, we investigate how this cognitive diversity influences collective outcomes. Results indicate that agents exhibit myopic and self-interested behaviors that exacerbate systemic inefficiencies. However, we demonstrate that information sharing effectively mitigates these adverse effects. Our findings extend traditional behavioral methods and offer new insights into the dynamics of AI-enabled organizations. This work underscores both the potential and limitations of LLM-based agents as proxies for human decision-making in complex operational environments.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes