CLMay 12

Sign Language Recognition and Translation for Low-Resource Languages: Challenges and Pathways Forward

arXiv:2605.1209661.5
Predicted impact top 97% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For researchers and practitioners working on sign language technology for under-resourced languages, this paper offers a structured analysis and actionable lessons, but it is a review without empirical results.

This systematic review identifies challenges in sign language recognition for low-resource languages, using Azerbaijan Sign Language as a case study, and proposes three paradigm shifts (data-centric AI, signer-adaptive systems, task-specific metrics) along with a technical roadmap. No concrete performance numbers are provided.

Sign languages are natural, visual-gestural languages used by Deaf communities worldwide. Over 300 distinct sign languages remain severely low-resource due to limited documentation, sparse datasets, and insufficient computational tools. This systematic review synthesizes literature on sign language recognition and translation for under-resourced languages, using Azerbaijan Sign Language (AzSL) as a case study. Analysis of global initiatives extracts eight actionable lessons, including community co-design, dialectal diversity capture, and privacy-preserving pose-based representations. Turkic sign languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Azerbaijani) receive special attention, as linguistic proximity enables effective transfer learning. We propose three paradigm shifts: from architecture-centric to data-centric AI, from signer-independent to signer-adaptive systems, and from reference-based to task-specific evaluation metrics. A technical roadmap for AzSL leverages lightweight MediaPipe-based architectures, community-validated annotations, and offline-first deployment. Progress requires sustained interdisciplinary collaboration centered on Deaf communities to ensure cultural authenticity, ethical governance, and practical communication benefit.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes