CLAIIRMay 15

Argus: Evidence Assembly for Scalable Deep Research Agents

arXiv:2605.1621797.1
Predicted impact top 6% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

For deep research agents, Argus addresses the problem of diminishing returns from parallel rollouts by using a Navigator to coordinate evidence collection, enabling scalable inference-time compute.

Argus treats deep research as assembling evidence pieces via a Searcher-Navigator architecture, achieving 12.7-point gain with 8 parallel Searchers and 86.2 on BrowseComp with 64 Searchers, surpassing proprietary agents while keeping reasoning context under 21.5K tokens.

Deep research agents have achieved remarkable progress on complex information seeking tasks. Even long ReAct style rollouts explore only a single trajectory, while recent state of the art systems scale inference time compute via parallel search and aggregation. Yet deep research answers are composed of complementary pieces of evidence, which parallel rollouts often duplicate rather than complete, yielding diminishing returns while pushing the aggregation context toward the model's limit. We propose Argus, an agentic system in which a Searcher and a Navigator cooperate to treat deep research as assembling a jigsaw from complementary evidence pieces, rather than brute forcing the whole answer in parallel. The Searcher collects evidence traces for a given sub-query through ReAct-style interaction. The Navigator maintains a shared evidence graph, verifying which pieces are still missing, dispatching Searchers to gather them, and reasoning over the completed graph to produce a source-traced final answer. We train the Navigator with reinforcement learning to verify, dispatch, and synthesize, while independently training the Searcher to remain a standard ReAct agent. The resulting Navigator supports rollouts with a single Searcher or many in parallel without retraining. With both Searcher and Navigator built on a 35B-A3B MoE backbone, Argus gains 5.5 points with a single Searcher and 12.7 points with 8 parallel Searchers, averaged over eight benchmarks. With 64 Searchers it reaches 86.2 on BrowseComp, surpassing every proprietary agent we benchmark, while the Navigator's reasoning context stays under 21.5K tokens.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes