Harnesses for Inference-Time Alignment over Execution Trajectories
Provides a theoretical framework and practical insights for designing more effective inference-time harnesses for LLM agents, addressing a known bottleneck in agent performance.
The paper studies inference-time harness design for LLM agents, separating it into task decomposition and guided execution. It identifies failure modes like over-decomposition and shows that partial harnesses (specifying only initial steps) can outperform fully structured workflows.
Harness engineering has emerged as an important inference-time technique for large language model (LLM) agents, aiming to improve long-term performance through task decomposition and guided execution. However, more elaborate harnesses are not uniformly better: increasing decomposition or guidance can sometimes improve execution, but can also reduce final task success. We study harness design through the lens of inference-time trajectory alignment. This perspective separates harness into two mechanisms: task decomposition, which structures a task into sub-goals, and guided execution, which reshapes local action distributions during execution. This decomposition allows us to quantify how workflow granularity, retry budgets, and guidance-induced action reweighting shape the performance limits of harness design. It further reveals concrete failure modes, including over-decomposition, over-pruning, and hallucinated execution. We validate these predictions through controlled synthetic experiments and real terminal agent benchmarks. Inspired by the theory, we further show that effective harnesses can be partial: specifying only the initial steps and leaving the remaining execution to agent can achieve higher pass rate than fully structured workflows.