Sumanta Roy

Sumanta Roy, Stephen T. Castonguay, Pratanu Roy et al.

We present $ϕ-$DeepONet, a physics-informed neural operator designed to learn mappings between function spaces that may contain discontinuities or exhibit non-smooth behavior. Classical neural operators are based on the universal approximation theorem which assumes that both the operator and the functions it acts on are continuous. However, many scientific and engineering problems involve naturally discontinuous input fields as well as strong and weak discontinuities in the output fields caused by material interfaces. In $ϕ$-DeepONet, discontinuities in the input are handled using multiple branch networks, while discontinuities in the output are learned through a nonlinear latent embedding of the interface. This embedding is constructed from a {\it one-hot} representation of the domain decomposition that is combined with the spatial coordinates in a modified trunk network. The outputs of the branch and trunk networks are then combined through a dot product to produce the final solution, which is trained using a physics- and interface-informed loss function. We evaluate $ϕ$-DeepONet on several one- and two-dimensional benchmark problems and demonstrate that it delivers accurate and stable predictions even in the presence of strong interface-driven discontinuities.

Seung Whan Chung, Stephen Castonguay, Sumanta Roy et al.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible framework for solving partial differential equations, but their performance on interface problems remains challenging because continuity and flux conditions are typically imposed through soft penalty terms. The standard soft-constraint formulation leads to imperfect interface enforcement and degraded accuracy near interfaces. We introduce two ansatz-based hard-constrained PINN formulations for interface problems that embed the interface physics into the solution representation and thereby decouple interface enforcement from PDE residual minimization. The first, termed the windowing approach, constructs the trial space from compactly supported windowed subnetworks so that interface continuity and flux balance are satisfied by design. The second, called the buffer approach, augments unrestricted subnetworks with auxiliary buffer functions that enforce boundary and interface constraints at discrete points through a lightweight correction. We study these formulations on one- and two-dimensional elliptic interface benchmarks and compare them with soft-constrained baselines. In one-dimensional problems, hard constraints consistently improve interface fidelity and remove the need for loss-weight tuning; the windowing approach attains very high accuracy (as low as $O(10^{-9})$) on simple structured cases, whereas the buffer approach remains accurate ($\sim O(10^{-5})$) across a wider range of source terms and interface configurations. In two dimensions, the buffer formulation is shown to be more robust because it enforces constraints through a discrete buffer correction, as the windowing construction becomes more sensitive to overlap and corner effects and over-constrains the problem. This positions the buffer method as a straightforward and geometrically flexible approach to complex interface problems.

Sumanta Roy, Bahador Bahmani, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis et al.

The predictive accuracy of operator learning frameworks depends on the quality and quantity of available training data (input-output function pairs), often requiring substantial amounts of high-fidelity data, which can be challenging to obtain in some real-world engineering applications. These datasets may be unevenly discretized from one realization to another, with the grid resolution varying across samples. In this study, we introduce a physics-informed operator learning approach by extending the Resolution Independent Neural Operator (RINO) framework to a fully data-free setup, addressing both challenges simultaneously. Here, the arbitrarily (but sufficiently finely) discretized input functions are projected onto a latent embedding space (i.e., a vector space of finite dimensions), using pre-trained basis functions. The operator associated with the underlying partial differential equations (PDEs) is then approximated by a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP), which takes as input a latent code along with spatiotemporal coordinates to produce the solution in the physical space. The PDEs are enforced via a finite difference solver in the physical space. The validation and performance of the proposed method are benchmarked on several numerical examples with multi-resolution data, where input functions are sampled at varying resolutions, including both coarse and fine discretizations.

Sumanta Roy, Chandrasekhar Annavarapu, Pratanu Roy et al.

We present an efficient physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) framework, termed Adaptive Interface-PINNs (AdaI-PINNs), to improve the modeling of interface problems with discontinuous coefficients and/or interfacial jumps. This framework is an enhanced version of its predecessor, Interface PINNs or I-PINNs (Sarma et al.; https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766623), which involves domain decomposition and assignment of different predefined activation functions to the neural networks in each subdomain across a sharp interface, while keeping all other parameters of the neural networks identical. In AdaI-PINNs, the activation functions vary solely in their slopes, which are trained along with the other parameters of the neural networks. This makes the AdaI-PINNs framework fully automated without requiring preset activation functions. Comparative studies on one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional benchmark elliptic interface problems reveal that AdaI-PINNs outperform I-PINNs, reducing computational costs by 2-6 times while producing similar or better accuracy.